Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Inflation’

Suicide of the Saver

October 22, 2011 Leave a comment

Submitted by Adrian Ash | BullionVault

-

Savers and pensioners! Your murderers need no revolution to storm your stately homes…

SO IT’S NOW 100 years since Great Britain established its welfare state, writes Adrian Ash online gold market BullionVault.

Shortly after, and as the First World War kicked off, Britain then abandoned the free exchange of bullion for notes under the classical Gold Standard. Those 3 events were a long way from simple coincidence, of course. But 100 years later, it is the monetary revolution which feels most pressing today.

Political fighting over the welfare state is hotting up, but a European shooting match looks unlikely (for now). Whereas UK savers and retirees risk getting slaughtered, alongside their peers on the continent, across North America and pretty much everywhere else.

Compared to the previous 100 years, real UK interest rates – the returns paid to cash deposits over and above inflation – have been atrocious since 1911. Averaging less than 0.9% per year, they’ve been a fraction of the 4.4% averaged in the 100 years starting in 1811, just after the British Parliament’s Bullion Committee recommended a full return to gold following the Napoleonic Wars, setting in train the global Gold Standard run from London until the start of World War I.

Enough ancient history; fast forward to today, and the UK’s real rate of interest is now the worst since 1975, back when inflation was running well into double digits but at least the central bank made a pretence of addressing it, setting a nominal base rate of 11%. Last month’s inflation reading was only a 20-year high, but all-time record-low interest rates make cash such a losing proposition, savers are actively paying to hold cash in the bank. And these unsecured creditors are lending to institutions whose “underlying problem is one of solvency not liquidity” as Bank of England governor Mervyn King himself put it in a speech this week.

Losing real value by holding money with insolvent banks sounds like financial suicide. Which for today’s moneyed classes – those millions of savers, pensioners and would-be retirees raised by the welfare state – should sound uncomfortably like the “euthanasia of the rentier” hoped for in the mid-1930s by J.M.Keynes, apostle of deficit spending (and nemesis of the Gold Standard), and slowly put into practice after World War Two by decades of sub-zero real interest rates. Taxation of unearned income peaking at 98% sure helped, too.

“Interest today rewards no genuine sacrifice, any more than does the rent of land,” wrote Keynes in 1936, just ahead of that “depression within a depression” which forced economists to coin a new term, “recession”.

“The owner of capital can obtain interest because capital is scarce,” Keynes went on, “just as the owner of land can obtain rent because land is scarce. But whilst there may be intrinsic reasons for the scarcity of land, there are no intrinsic reasons for the scarcity of capital…I see, therefore, the rentier aspect of capitalism as a transitional phase which will disappear when it has done its work…The euthanasia of the rentier, of the functionless investor, will be nothing sudden, merely a gradual but prolonged continuance of what we have seen recently in Great Britain, and will need no revolution.”

Today’s savers might not see themselves as “functionless investors” anymore than they see themselves as stuffed-shirt aristocrats wielding “the cumulative oppressive power of the capitalist to exploit the scarcity-value of capital”. But the owner of capital, however modest, can no longer obtain interest, that much is plain. Because capital is no longer scarce. Solvency is. And there’s a whole heap of 21st-century rentiers waiting to put out of their misery yet.

Looking to Buy Gold today…?

Source

Suicide of the Saver
by Adrian Ash
BullionVault
Wednesday, 19 October 2011

Savers and pensioners! Your murderers need no revolution to storm your stately homes and
palaces…

IT’S NOW 100 years since Great Britain established its welfare state. Shortly after, and as
the First World War kicked off, it abandoned the free exchange of bullion for notes under the
classical Gold Standard.

Those 3 events were far from unrelated, but 100 years later it’s the monetary shift which
feels most pressing right now. Yes, political fighting over the welfare state is hotting up,
but a European shooting match looks unlikely (for the time being). Whereas UK savers and
retirees, like their peers across the continent, in North America and pretty much everywhere
else, are getting slaughtered.

Compared to the previous 100 years, real UK interest rates – the returns paid to cash deposits
over and above inflation – have been atrocious since 1911. Averaging less than 0.9% per
year, they’ve been a fraction of the 4.4% averaged in the 100 years starting in 1811, just after
the British Parliament’s Bullion Committee recommended a full return to gold following the
Napoleonic Wars, setting in train the global Gold Standard run from London until the start of
World War I.

Enough ancient history; fast forward to today, and the UK’s real rate of interest is now the
worst since 1975, back when inflation was running well into double digits but at least the
central bank made a pretence of addressing it, setting a nominal base rate of 11%. Last
month’s inflation reading was only a 20-year high, but all-time record-low interest rates make
cash such a losing proposition, savers are actively paying to hold cash in the bank. And these
unsecured creditors are lending to institutions whose “underlying problem is one of solvency
not liquidity” as Bank of England governor Mervyn King himself put it in a speech last night.

Losing real value by holding money with insolvent banks sounds like financial suicide.
Which for today’s moneyed classes – those millions of savers, pensioners and would-be
retirees raised by the welfare state – should sound uncomfortably like the “euthanasia of the
rentier” hoped for in the mid-1930s by J.M.Keynes, apostle of deficit spending (and nemesis
of the Gold Standard), and slowly put into practice after World War Two by decades of sub-
zero real interest rates. Taxation of unearned income peaking at 98% sure helped, too.

“Interest today rewards no genuine sacrifice, any more than does the rent of land,” wrote
Keynes in 1936, just ahead of that “depression within a depression” which forced economists
to coin a new term, “recession”.

“The owner of capital can obtain interest because capital is scarce,” Keynes went on, “just
as the owner of land can obtain rent because land is scarce. But whilst there may be intrinsic
reasons for the scarcity of land, there are no intrinsic reasons for the scarcity of capital…I see,
therefore, the rentier aspect of capitalism as a transitional phase which will disappear when it
has done its work…The euthanasia of the rentier, of the functionless investor, will be nothing
sudden, merely a gradual but prolonged continuance of what we have seen recently in Great
Britain, and will need no revolution.”

Today’s savers might not see themselves as “functionless investors” anymore than they see
themselves as stuffed-shirt aristocrats wielding “the cumulative oppressive power of the
capitalist to exploit the scarcity-value of capital”. But the owner of capital, however modest,
can no longer obtain interest, that much is plain. Because capital is no longer scarce. But
solvency is.

Adrian Ash
BullionVault

Decoded: Is there Any Gold in Fort Knox?

October 12, 2011 2 comments

-
In 1933, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt outlawed the private ownership of gold by American citizens, forcing them to sell any gold bullion in excess of $100 to the Federal Reserve at $20.67 per troy ounce. To store the huge stockpile of confiscated gold, the US Treasury built the United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, Kentucky, in 1936. This vault has a 25″ thick casing with a 21″ vault door made of the latest torch and drill resistant material weighing 20 tons.

There must be something very valuable in there to justify this level of security.  Official records say there’s 4,577 metric tons (147.2 million oz. troy) of gold bullion worth over $200 billion at current prices. Of late however, there’s an increasing number of respectable people questioning the notion that the stated amount of gold is actually still there, and if so, that it remains unencumbered.

In this History Channel documentary Decoded, Brad Meltzer attempts to answer the question “Is there any gold in Fort Knox?”. Featuring interviews with notable figures like Chris Powell of GATA,  Law Professor Kevin Goldberg, Senator Dee Huddleston, former US Senator of Kentucky and many more, it’s an eye opener.

Part 1 “What if I told you that Fort Knox is empty.The last time anyone was allowed inside was in 1974. Many experts today believe the soilders stationed here are protecting absolutely nothing.They point to numerous theories to explain their believes.., but if you tell me that no one’s been allowed to see this gold since 1974, I want to know if it’s there and I want to know what else is inside. It is time to decode Fort Knox.”

-

Part 2 Craig Hulet, a returning veteran charged with issuing weapons to guards at Fort Knox was told by his Officer In Charge not to issue any ammunition because there was no gold inside. As for potential armed intruders - there’s a policy of “Let them in and zip them up”.A Financial Engineer from Princeton who spoke on condition of anonymity discusses the implications of an empty Fort Knox. He compares his work on financial derivatives at Wall Street to the Manhattan Project.

-

Part 3-

-

Is there Gold in Fort Knox?

-
Related Articles:

The Gold Bubble - Rebuttal by Jonathan Kosares

September 13, 2011 1 comment

by Jonathan Kosares | USAGold

-

Caveat Lector
“Let the Reader Beware”

Members of Wells Fargo’s wealth management team released an article recently entitled, “The Gold Bubble,” where it is claimed, in no uncertain terms, that gold is in a bubble. While I would not normally spend time rebutting an entity that would shock me far more if they actually put out a recommendation to buy gold, the subsequent readership this article has received (it was referenced in the business section of the Denver Post, for example) suggests it might be an entertaining, and perhaps useful exercise, to dissect their claims point by point to see what, if any, validity they carry. I also am of the impression that, as coverage on gold becomes increasingly mainstream, gold owners will also be faced with an increasing sum of articles of this type that seek to challenge their resolve. My hope is that this analysis will provide something of template of skepticism, that not everything you read, no matter how credible the source, is necessarily giving you the complete picture.

In their introduction, Wells Fargo Wealth Management (WFWM) writes,

“As with all bubbles, we know that we run the risk that our view may turn out to be wrong (“early” would be our preferred euphemism) in the short run; however, we believe that we will be proven right in the long run. Some will vehemently call us “crazy” and “naïve” for being unenlightened to gold’s zero gravity investment properties, but that will only help to steel our convictions (we similarly took our licks from critics in the past when we expressed concerns about speculative bubbles in technology stocks and housing).”

I’m immediately suspicious of an argument that seeks to so craftily rebuff and undermine any response before it is even presented. Yet, I find myself willing to risk ridicule, to ‘steel the conviction’ of Wells Fargo, to show that while even the craziest prediction can be proven right given enough time, in this case Wells Fargo isn’t just ‘early’, they’re way too early, and they aren’t ‘crazy’ or ‘naïve’, they’re just plain wrong. In defense of their conclusion, WFWM presents seven arguments. They are as follows:

WFWM - Volatile Price Movements: With very little warning, the bottom can drop out on gold prices very quickly. For example, during six short months in 2008, gold lost more than 30 percent of its value. In the 1980s, in a little more than two years, the price of gold dropped approximately 65 percent. When fear subsides, inflation doesn’t sky-rocket, and everything begins to return to “normal,” demand for gold can fade away quickly. Last week in response to rising volatility in gold prices the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), the world’s largest futures market, raised the margin requirements for trading gold futures contracts by 22 percent. The CME has a history of raising margin requirements on futures contracts when price volatility increases as a way of further protecting investors’ interests.

JK - Gold did lose 30% of its value in six months during the last half of 2008. However, over the exact same six months referred, the DOW lost 47% of its value. Moreover, it only took gold a little over three moths to recover its losses and ultimately surpass its value before the drop. Three years later the Dow has yet to recover its pre-drop levels. The second statement is also true, however it needs to also be noted that gold doubled twice in the year preceding the referenced drop, going from just over $226/oz to $875 at its peak (that’s a 387% increase in one year!). At the writing of this article, even granting this advisory the very top in gold at $1919, gold has increased a manageable 47% in the last year, a mere fraction of what it did in a year’s time in 1980. Put another way, the pace of gold’s performance this August (a 22% gain) would have to increase to 30% monthly, and continue for an entire year to accomplish the same percentage gains seen in 1979. The next claim that gold will fall ‘when fear subsides…’ is nebulous, at best. At a minimum, this supposition should be led with an “if”. Much is assumed by the word “when”. When is “when”? Next year? Five years from now? To say a lot can happen between now and when ‘when’ is a reality would be an understatement.

In continuing, the authors of this article are doing a serious disservice to their readers by suggesting the practice of raising margin requirements carries some ‘profound significance’ to a market, specifically the gold market. Futures are priced in terms of fixed dollar figures, not percentages. So as the price of an asset increases, the margin, or the amount of money it takes to control a futures contract, while remaining constant in dollar terms, is gradually reduced percentage-wise. In essence, by not raising margin requirements as the underlying asset appreciates, the CME indirectly adds leverage to the market (it takes the same amount of money to control increasingly valuable contracts). By raising margins, the CME simply recalibrates the nominal, or dollar, amount required to control a contract to be more appropriately balanced against the value of the contract, thereby removing this added leverage. This process most frequently and logically occurs when a market makes a sharp, one-directional move. Not because of a general environment of ‘increased volatility’ as is suggested here. For some added context, it had been about a year since CME had hiked rates for gold futures at the time of this notice by WFWM. In that time, the price of gold appreciated 47%, so the referenced hike of 22%, and subsequent 27% hike on August 24th, are exactly equivalent to the underlying rise in the gold price, plus a small cushion.

WFWM - No Income: Most investments have some sort of cash flow potential: stocks have dividends, bonds have coupons, and real estate has rent. This flow creates intrinsic value. However, gold, like many other commodities, does not have any simple, inherent cash flow. In fact, when one factors the incumbent costs of ownership (transportation, storage, insurance, protection, assay fees, etc.), gold, in its physical or derivative form, can actually be considered to have a negative yield.

JK - This has long been the argument against gold ownership by the financial community in favor of alternative asset classes. But to be fair, gold ownership shouldn’t be in competition with the asset classes listed here. What gold ought to compete with in an individual’s portfolio are money market accounts, savings accounts, CD’s and other cash instruments. Most of the analysts calling gold a bubble are missing the key role gold serves, which is as an international currency, and savings vehicle, separate from the eroding effect of government policy. Those who understand the true value of gold ownership know ‘income’ isn’t the true goal.

WFWM - Greater Fool Dependence: Because it has no inherent earnings power and little intrinsic value, investors in gold are hoping that other investors will come along to bid up their holdings in the future. While a common tactic of speculators, the “greater fool” approach is rarely a good long-term investment strategy. In fact, it was this strategy that led us to the recent housing market crisis. During that period, lenders, homeowners and real estate investors assumed that home prices would continue to climb into perpetuity.

JK – If this is an attempt to refute supply/demand economics, it takes more than three sentences. Moreover, by this broadly stated and poorly supported metric, nearly every freely traded investment vehicle on the planet is governed by the same dependence on the “greater fool”. Stocks are certainly no different. In fact, it is the premise of one personAllan Greenspan believing something is worth more or less than another that ultimately makes a ‘free’ market. The only market that would not have the presence of a ‘greater fool’ would be the one that never came down, or traded at a constant value, which in truth, is no market at all. Where this argument is truly flawed however is by failing to acknowledge again the evolving role of gold as a currency within the international monetary system. It is the only currency that cannot be printed and debased, and whose value is not subject to the stability (or instability) of a local government. Though gold is indeed of ‘little intrinsic value’ when viewed solely for its uses as a pure commodity, its bull run has nothing to do with the metrics that drive the value of pure commodities like food, grain and energy. As Alan Greenspan stated recently, “Gold, unlike all other commodities, is a currency. And the major thrust in the demand for gold is not for jewelry. It’s not for anything other than an escape from what is perceived to be a fiat money system, paper money, that seems to be deteriorating.” To put it another way, gold ownership is an expression of a belief that those who blindly retain currency in this environment are perhaps the ‘greatest fools’ of all.

WFWM - Central Bank Activity: Lately, there has been a great deal of attention in the news about central bank purchases of gold. However, it is important to note that, in aggregate, the central banks of developed countries have been net sellers of gold in recent years. That trend may change since the political back-drop of future supply and demand dynamics of central banks is quite difficult to predict.

JK – Wait a second…this is a bearish argument for gold? So central banks for the first time in a decade are net buyers of gold, suggesting a broad-based shift in sentiment, and that’s a bearish indicator? And the trend may change because it is difficult to predict the political back-drop of future supply and demand dynamics? Not to be cynical, but would it not be equally difficult to predict the political backdrop of future bail-outs should banks find themselves undercapitalized in the future? That aside, central bank activity is not extraordinarily complex, as this would insinuate. Central banks are responding to the current environment in the same way as individual investors. As a general practice, central banks hold a basket of currencies, so they are buying gold, not necessarily to make a return, but to hedge the inherent risk within their reserves. As long as nation states as a group pursue policies meant to debase their currencies, central banks, and in many cases those same central banks, will continue to be buyers of gold for the same reasons most private investors own it.

WF - Inflation Fighting Properties are Overstated: The chart below challenges the idea that gold is an effective hedge against inflation, as it shows that stocks have experienced a far superior after-inflation-adjusted return over the past 25 years. This longer time-frame view of gold puts into perspective a more realistic time horizon for many investors.

Graph Stocks Beat Gold

JK – I have a chart too, courtesy of Ronald Stoferle and the Erste Group. And mine goes back farther, with a longer time-frame view, 1971 to be exact, and there isn’t even a worthwhile comparison. The problem with the graph above is that it comprises the greatest 20-year bull market in stock history, while also including the most disheartening 20-year bear market in gold. Wells Fargo has chosen an awfully convenient date range to make their argument.

Gold vs. S&P Graph

Warren Buffet’s View on Gold Values: In a recent interview on CNBC, the renowned investor Warren Buffett crystallized the concerns that prudent investors have with gold at current price levels:

Warren Buffet“. . .if you took all of the gold in the world it would roughly make a cube 67 feet on a side and that would be the whole thing. Now for that same cube of gold it would be worth at today’s market prices about $7 trillion. That’s probably about a third of the value of all the stocks in the United States. So you could have a choice of owning a third of all the stocks in the United States or you could have a choice of owning that little block of gold, which can’t do anything but kind of shine there and make you feel like Midas or Croesus or something of the sort.

Now, for $7 trillion, there are roughly a billion of farm-acres of farmland in the United States. They’re valued at about $2 1/2 trillion. It’s about half the continental United States, this farmland. You could have all the farmland in the United States, you could have about seven ExxonMobils, and you could have $1 trillion of walking around money. And if you offered me the choice of looking at some 67-foot cube of gold and looking at it all day, you know, I mean touching it and fondling it occasionally, you know, and then saying, you know, `Do something for me,’ and it says, `I don’t do anything. I just stand here and look pretty.’ And the alternative to that was to have all the farmland of the country, everything, cotton, corn, soybeans, seven ExxonMobils. Just think of that. Add $1 trillion of walking around money. I, you know, maybe call me crazy but I’ll take the farmland and the ExxonMobils.”

JK – This isn’t the first time these comments by Warren Buffett have been utilized in an argument against gold ownership. I think its use in this case is due some context, however. First, this interview wasn’t all that ‘recent’. In fact, it was conducted with Ben Stein on October 19, 2010, when the gold price was $1335.00… not during the very recent run up in the gold prices, as this article suggests. Second, Buffet’s recommendation in lieu of gold?… buy the VTI, or Vanguard total market index ETF. At the time of the above interview, VTI was trading at $62 and change, which is exactly the same price it is trading for today, versus a 35%+ increase the gold price. Last, and most importantly, this is an unrealistic comparison for the everyday investor. Buffett speaks of owning all of the gold in the world, versus what all of that gold could buy. In the vacuum of extremes, perhaps Buffett’s thoughts aren’t incorrect. They make a sort of sense to me. But the reality is that no one could buy all of the farmland in the United States. Nor could one individual own all of the gold. It isn’t a practical comparison. Cases for or against owning an asset need to be made in reality, and the reality is that gold ownership is spread across millions of owners, who all believe it has a value beyond ‘looking pretty’. Because of this universal belief, gold commands a relevance that should not be so cynically dismissed.

You Can’t Eat Gold: For all the talk of gold’s antidotal properties vis-à-vis fiat currencies, beyond its few industrial and jewelry uses, it is hard to see that gold has much intrinsic value. Gold doesn’t readily produce cash flow, doesn’t provide shelter, can’t be eaten, nor does it provide efficient clothing. There is certainly some intrinsic value, but, in our view, not $1,800 per ounce worth of intrinsic value. Further, all sound investments provide some element of societal benefit. However, digging gold up out of the ground, refining it, forming it into bars, and then burying it back in the ground again—specifically in elaborate, highly-protected underground vaults—doesn’t seem to provide substantive economic value to society, other than being a short-term speculative store of value.

JK - I think I’ll reflect on the thought above while snacking on a salad of $100 bills beneath the shade of my stock certificates. Mmmmm, so satisfying. Yes, this argument is that silly. And to the thought of providing an economic benefit to society, I’d say simply this: Nothing is of greater economic detriment to society than government policy that uses debt, currency debasement, and leverage to produce the illusion of perpetual economic growth. So if gold, since it is uniquely detached from the eroding effect of these government policies, protects its owners against their repercussions, it is certainly of substantive economic benefit to the individual. For nothing else so efficiently provides the protection and peace of mind otherwise absent in the majority of today’s investment options.

-


Jonathan Kosares graduated cum laude from the University of Notre Dame, earning a double major in Finance and Computer Applications. He has been an account executive for the firm since 2002.

This newsletter is distributed with the understanding that it has been prepared for informational purposes only and the Publisher or Author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, financial or other professional services. The information in this newsletter is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute a lawyer-client relationship, accountant-client relationship, or any other type of relation-ship. If legal or financial advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. The Author disclaims all warranties and any personal liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence of the use and application, either directly or indirectly, of any information presented herein.

When will the paper currency you’re holding be the next victim of this global currency war?

September 7, 2011 Leave a comment

-

Top 10 currency gainers as at Aug 2011

Top 10 currency gainers as at Aug 2011

Two weeks ago, the Swiss Franc was one of the most sought after currencies. Yesterday, a short statement from the Swiss National Bank (SNB) turned the tide.

The current massive overvaluation of the Swiss franc poses an acute threat to the Swiss economy and carries the risk of a deflationary development.

The Swiss National Bank (SNB) is therefore aiming for a substantial and sustained weakening of the Swiss franc. With immediate effect, it will no longer tolerate a EUR/CHF exchange rate below the minimum rate of CHF 1.20. The SNB will enforce this minimum rate with the utmost determination and is prepared to buy foreign currency in unlimited quantities.

Even at a rate of CHF 1.20 per euro, the Swiss franc is still high and should continue to weaken over time. If the economic outlook and deflationary risks so require, the SNB will take further measures

That’s how fragile the so called safe haven currencies are. Their value and potential devaluation is just a few keystrokes away. This was not the first time the SNB intervened to devalue its currency. It quadrupled its foreign currency holdings in the first half of 2010 in a similar effort to manage the CHF resulting in a record $21 billion loss. Going further back, it pegged the Franc to the German Mark at 0.80 in 1978 resulting in soaring inflation.

Yesterday’s intervention resulted in this dramatic move in the price of gold priced in CHF. That’s not surprising considering the fact that it pledged to ” buy foreign currency in unlimited quantities”. Unlike Greece and other Eurozone countries in crisis, the SNB can print unlimited quantities of CHF to honour that pledge.

Gold priced in CHF after the SNB statement

Gold priced in CHF gained 8% following the SNB statement

-

The Big Picture of CHF devaluation - One Year Gold in CHF

Putting a floor below 1.2 EUR/CHF appears to be worse than the much criticized move by Malaysia to peg the Ringgit at 3.8 to the USD in 1998. Unlike a peg, a floor allows the CHF to weaken but not strengthen against the EUR. One has to wonder, what will happen to this “former safe haven” currency if the Euro collapsed.

Of late, currency devaluation, capital controls and aggressive central bank interventions have become acceptable, if not respectable, as seen in Brazil, Japan, Switzerland, Iceland, Vietnam & the once almighty US, just to name a few.

When will the paper currency you’re holding be the next victim of this global currency war?

Related Articles:

-

Why $20,000 Gold doesn’t excite me

August 24, 2011 3 comments

-

It scares me!

Gold punched through $1,900 today. If the current financial system can withstand the stress and remained intact till the day gold trades at $20,000 an ounce, what will life be like then?

If we’re holding gold at that time, we may be doing fine but we are not likely to be 10 times richer. That’s because nothing much has happened to our gold. Rather, paper currencies would have lost so much purchasing power that it would take 10 times more of the same to buy what we could buy today. A Big Mac will most likely cost around $43 in the US. In Malaysia, NZ and Britain, it’ll like be  around RM76NZ$54 and £25 respectively (estimates based on Big Mac Index). When a basic meal costs that much, life can be very tough for savers who continued holding on to their paper currencies or other paper assets.

Many of my friends and relatives, from retired professionals to missionaries have been ill advised to rely on supposedly safe or high yielding investments like mutual funds, government managed pension schemes, term deposits or hot stocks to generate passive income or preserve the value of their retirement funds. Despite being presented with information from this website and elsewhere, there’s little affinity shown towards gold or silver. This scares me and for their sake, I hope gold does not get anywhere close to $20,000 before they get on board.

What’s even scarier is the fact that an enormously huge segment of society do not have the means to get on board, even if they wanted to. We’re looking at the 1.4 billion people living on less than NZ$2.25 a day. That’s less than 0.05 ounces of silver! They worry not about the Fed nor the Cartel but about how to provide food, clothing, housing and healthcare with that amount each day. It’s about survival, not savings. Pause for a moment to imagine their plight when gold hits $20,000.  Spare them a thought today, and check out their appeal for assistance.

Why $20,000 gold?

In this recently released documentary, Mike Maloney presents the case for $20,000 gold by stepping back and looking at the big picture. He takes us back, very far back, and paints us a very big picture. This excellent educational video is a must watch, especially if you’re new to the Political Metals space. It’ll be your 90 minutes well spent.

But if you can’t spare the time, I’ve highlighted some of his key points with some new charts below for a quick read.

-

Dow/Gold Ratio Chart: Where are we in the Wealth Cycle? 

Using the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Dow) as a measure of performance of the equities market in general, the ratio of the Dow to the price of gold indicates the performance of equities market relative to gold. Currently each point of the Dow is worth about 6oz of gold. During the process of correction after the biggest stock market bubble in history, the ratio is expected to head towards the historical mean (4oz) and overshoot it before finding its fair value again.

The bigger the bubble (deviation from mean), the larger the overshoot. During the present cycle, Mike expects the overshoot to touch 0.5:1 (1 oz of gold worth 2 points of Dow). In its extreme, the Dow would have to collapse from 11,000 to 950 if the price of gold remains at current level of $1,900. Conversely, gold will increase to $22,000 if the Dow remains at current levels.

Relative performance of Dow Vs Gold & Silver since Jan 2000
(Worst reference point, at peak of stock market bubble)

Relative performance of Dow Vs Gold & Silver since March 2009
(Best reference point, at the start of QE1)

-

Currency Supply Chart: Where are we in the Inflation/Deflation Cycle?

For simplicity, “money” & “currency” are used interchangeably here. Watch the video to see the difference.

Monetary inflation is the increase in money supply resulting in price inflation (rising prices of goods & services), with a time lag between the former and the latter. The reverse applies to monetary deflation and price deflation. Studying the trend in money supply or the total amount of currency in circulation (CinC) over a period of time gives us an idea of where we are and where we’re heading in terms of inflation and deflation.

Money is created in two stages. The initial Base Money is created by the Fed (or other central banks). More new money is then created (up to 9 times the initial Base Money) within the private banking system through credit. It is loaned into existence. Watch the video to learn more about the money creation process.

The chart above  represents the amount of CinC that’s exclusively created by the private banking system. The highlighted area indicates that this component of the overall money supply has dropped by $1.7T since the 2008 crisis. This is the Debt Collapse or Credit Contraction. Less lending by banks results in less money chasing goods and services, leading to price & asset deflation. It is evident from the chart that a contraction of this magnitude has never happened since 1960. The last time it happened was just before the Great Depression of the 1930s.

M1: Increase in Base MoneyIn response to this credit contraction, and in an attempt to prevent another Great Depression, the Fed has been rapidly increasing the Base Money supply by creating new money. The recent rate of increase is unprecedented. The first trillion dollars was created over a period of about 90 years. The next $1.4T came into existence over the last 2 years!

This rapid increase in Base Money (red chart) was an attempt to offset the decrease in the credit money (blue chart). When we add these two components of money supply together, we obtain the total CinC (Base Money plus Credit Money) as shown in the chart below.

Notice the contraction at the top of the chart, albeit a smaller one. It is evident that despite the frantic pace of money printing by the Fed, it has not succeeded in offsetting the reduction in money supply due to credit contraction.

The Fed has little choice but to continue creating money.  With such a large perturbation in total currency supply and due to the complexity and size of the monetary system, it is not possible for the Fed or anyone else to create just sufficient money at just the right rate such that the total CinC won’t overshoot its long term trend. The principle that the larger the deviation from the mean, the larger will be the overshoot during the correction applies here as in the stock market above. The fact that there’s an undetermined time lag, between monetary inflation and price inflation further adds to the likelihood that the next round of money printing will result in a massive overshoot. Coupled with other factors, hyperinflation could be just round the corner.

Deflation or Inflation?

In his book, Rich Dad’s Advisors: Guide to Investing In Gold and Silver: Protect Your Financial Future, and again in his presentation, Mike predicted the following sequence of events:-

  1. Threat of deflation - At the onset of the 2008 crisis (Past)
  2. Money printing - TARP, QE1, QE2 (Past & more to come)
  3. Big inflation - Here and now (anyone disagree?)
  4. Real deflation - Asset deflation in real estate & stock market (The severe but short deflation  is ahead)
  5. Hyperinflation - Just round the corner?

How does gold perform under inflation and deflation environment? Check out the study by Oxford Economics: “Impact of inflation and deflation on the case for gold”.

Related Resources:

-

S&P Downgrade: BullionVault’s 24×7 trading platform may offer some clue on what’s ahead for gold on Monday

August 7, 2011 3 comments

-
Updated Monday, Aug 8. Go directly to updates
-

After the markets closed Friday, S&P downgraded US credit rating from AAA to AA+ with a negative watch.  Although there have been warnings as far back as April, this is significant because it is the first time the US actually lost its sterling AAA rating since it was granted in 1917. S&P’s full report in pdf. Dagong, the Chinese Credit Rating Company lowered the United States to A+ last November after the U.S. Federal Reserve decided to continue loosening its monetary policy and announced a further downgrade to A earlier in the week.

With this historic downgrade the US credit rating is at par with New Zealand and the bonds of Germany, France, Canada and the UK now have a higher rating.

Initial reactions to the downgrade

Buffet, whose Berkshire Hathaway was downgraded from AAA to AA+ by S&P in February, told FBN late Friday that the downgrade of the United States’ triple-A credit rating “doesn’t make sense.” He further went on to say

If nothing else takes place, meaning, if all other variables hold and there isn’t say, a new problem in Europe, it won’t make any difference. “Think about it. The U.S., to my knowledge owes no money in currency other than the U.S. dollar, which it can print at will. Now if you’re talking about inflation, that’s a different question.”

Peter Schiff, on the other hand, thinks that the downgrade was not low enough! Claiming that he has a higher credibility than S&P for giving the sub prime mortgage related bonds junk status way back in 2006 while S&P continued rating them at triple A, he thinks this downgrade is going to accelerate the flight from the US$ and kick off a self-perpectuating loop of Downgrades > Higher Interest Rates > Weaker Economy > Increased Deficit > More Downgrades.

-

Some seem to think that Wall Street insiders knew of the impending downgrade and have already started to sell down stocks the whole of last week. While the global stock markets lost about 10% last week in the midst of worsening Euro zone crisis, the US$ did not experience the “flight to safety” effect as it did in 2008, despite the fact that Switzerland and Japan intervened aggressively in the market to prop up the dollar. On the other hand, gold hit another weekly all time high despite a slightly stronger dollar.

Gold bugs and holders of hard currencies are eagerly looking forward to an exciting week to see how the big boys move their paper assets around. Would they be chasing perceived relatively stronger fiat currencies like the Euro or still-standing triple A paper assets or would there be a frantic flight to gold (& silver).

-

Any clue from BullionVault’s Round-the-Clock trading physical gold platform?

While all markets are closed for the weekend, BullionVault’s 24×7 physical gold & silver trading platform may give a clue of what’s ahead Sunday night when Asian markets open Monday morning.

Clients at BullionVault are able to trade physical gold & silver with each other (with BullionVault as a dealer) or directly with BullionVault as principal. A recent check online shows that offers have dried up for gold at their New York and London vaults.

Normally, even during weekends, there are active bids and offers at reasonable market depths. See typical screenshots here. At time of writing, there’s only 3.236kg (104oz) on offer at the London vault while the New York vault has only ONE oz (0.031kg) on offer at whopping $1804/oz ($58,000/kg). The markets at Zurich vault looks more normal, albeit at a much higher spread of 0.93%.

-

Finally, Dan Norcini has this to say about in his KWN interview on Aug 6, 2011. Read the interview here.

“I would expect the immediate reaction to the news in Asian trade Sunday evening will be to see the US Treasury markets open lower in a knee jerk reaction with gold opening higher from the get go. Whether or not the bond markets recover is unclear at this time since some of this might have been reflected in the move lower in the bonds just before the close of Friday trading late in the afternoon yesterday.

-

Updated 8 Aug (Monday Morning in Asia)

Gold up $25, Dow futures down 276 points when market opens in Asia. Buffet is wrong, Schiff is right!

Monday Morning, Gold jumps to $1690: BullionVault 1-week chart

-
By noon, Asian market.

BullionVault Chart: Gold hits $1700 and climbing

Back to Top

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 172 other followers