Archive

Posts Tagged ‘S&P 500’

Nothing At All, Then All at Once

February 9, 2013 Leave a comment

I’ve been reminded by a reader that it’s my second anniversary at PoliticalMetals.com, a place for me to share what I’ve learnt regarding the true nature of the two historic monetary metals, gold and silver – that they are more political than precious.

Time flies. Over the past two years, much has transpired in the political metals world… yet, not much, depending on how you’re looking at it.

On the fiat currency front, we’ve witnessed the launching of QE2, Operation Twist, LTRO 1 & 2, QE3, QE4 and Draghi’s unlimited bond- purchase program also known as “We’ll do whatever it takes” policy and the escalation of Eurozone debt crisis. Elsewhere around the globe, we saw the devaluation of the Swiss franc when it was pegged against the euro, the Bank of Japan’s ¥80 trillion stimulus,  Reserve Bank of Australia’s interest rate cut, Venezuela’s 32% currency devaluation, the South Korean central bank; the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the People’s Bank of China and other central banks joining the global currency war in earnest.

On the gold front, Venezuela repatriated 211 tonnes of it’s gold from the Bank of England and other bullion banks, Germany’s Bundesbank began repatriation of its 700 tonnes of gold reserves from New York and Paris, Iran began trading oil for gold with Turkey, India & China following its ejection from the SWIFT international electronic banking system. Central banks turned from net sellers to net buyers of gold, with unprecedented purchases by the likes of China, Russia, India, Brazil and South Korea, Mexico, Thailand, Venezuela, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Columbia, Ukraine, and others totaling a massive 965 tonnes  in 2011 & 2012. On retail end, the US mint reported that the American Silver Eagle recorded the highest monthly sales figure in the history of the program, while the American Gold Eagle reached the highest monthly sales in more than two years in January 2013.

Gold in 2011 and 2012

With the insane amount of new fiat currencies being created globally and the unusually huge demand and movements of physical gold, one would expect a robust price action in these two precious metals. The two year chart above shows that it’s clearly not the case. Gold moved from $1,350 in Feb 2011 to a high of $1,900 within 6 months. Thereafter, it has been consolidating and moving sideways for a good 18 months. Silver’s price action follows the same pattern. This prolonged period of consolidation, the longest since the 2008 financial crisis, seems like an eternity for those waiting for these political metals to do what they do best – act as a gauge for inflation and effects of new money creation.

Why? The price action would only make sense when gold & silver is viewed as political metals rather than precious metals. Read about it here and here.

In a nutshell, I can sum it all up in the 5 carefully chosen quotes. Read them carefully. Think. I’m sure you’ll get the idea.

  • Gold is not money Ben Bernanke’s testimony to Congress in 2011
  • Gold is money. Everything else is credit J.P. Morgan’s words to Congress in 1912
  • When you own gold you’re fighting every central bank in the world Jim Rickards
  • Central banks are both referees and players in today’s markets Mohamed El-Erian, Pimco
  • There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

As far as timing goes, I believe Lenin is spot on. We are in a calm before the storm. Adrian Ash of BullionVault sent over a very timely article today – Nothing at all, then all at once. Have a read, and stay prepared.

Nothing At All, Then All at Once

Where money was tight, suddenly it’s all arrived at once. Just like trouble does…

EVERYWHERE we look, investors suddenly see nothing but blue skies, plain sailing ahead. Their change of heart makes us nervous, writes Adrian Ash at BullionVault.

  • New York’s S&P index is back where it stood in July 2007 – right before the global credit crunch first bit, eating more than half the stock market’s value inside 2 years…
  • Japan’s Nikkei index has jumped by one third since mid-Nov., thanks to export companies getting a 20% drop in the Yen – the currency’s fastest drop since right before the Asian Crisis of 1997…
  • And here in the UK – where the FTSE-100 stock index just enjoyed its strongest January since 1989, when house prices then suffered their biggest post-war drop – average house prices are rising year-on-year, even as the economy shrinks…

The common factor? Zero interest rates and money creation on a scale never tried outside Weimar Germany or Mugabe’s Zimbabwe. Only the Eurozone has stood aside so far, and even then only a little. And yet gold and silver – the most sensitive assets to money inflation – are worse than becalmed.

Daily swings in the silver price haven’t been this small since spring 2007. Volatility in the gold price has only been lower than Thursday this week on 15 days since the doldrums of mid-2005. Back then the Dollar also steadied and rose after multi-year falls. Industrial commodities outperfomed ‘safe haven’ gold too – a pattern echoed here in early 2013 by the surge in the price of useful platinum over industrially ‘useless’ gold.

Perhaps the flat-lining points to better times ahead. Gold after all is where retained capital hides when things are bad – a store of value to weather the storm. Or it may signal itchy feet in the ‘hot money’ crowd, now moving back into stocks and shares instead. But we can’t shake the feeling that something awful is afoot. Gold and silver aren’t making headlines today. Just like they didn’t before the financial crisis began.

“Japan is on an unsustainable path of a strong Yen and deflation,” wrote Andy Xie – once of Morgan Stanley, now director of Rosetta Stone Advisors – back in March 2012.

“The unprofitability of Japan’s major exporters and emerging trade deficits suggest that the end of this path is in sight. The transition from a strong to weak Yen will likely be abrupt, involving a sudden and big devaluation of 30 to 40 percent.”

Already since the Abe-nomic revolution announced in November the Yen has dropped more than 20% versus the Dollar. But “there is plenty of liquidity still parked in the Yen,” Xie noted this week. Quite apart from the shock to America’s trade deficit which surging shale-oil supplies deliver, “The Dollar bull is due less to the United States’ strengths than the weaknesses in other major economies,” he adds. And reviewing the last two major counter-trend rallies in the Dollar’s otherwise permanent decline, “The first dollar bull market in the 1980s triggered the Latin American debt crisis, the second the Asian Financial Crisis. Neither was a coincidence.”

Neither of those crises coincided with a bull market in gold or silver. Savers worldwide chose Dollars instead as the hottest emerging-market investments collapsed. But then neither of those slumps saw emerging-market central banks so stuffed with money, nor gold and silver so freely available to their citizens.

China’s gold imports almost doubled last year, with net demand overtaking India for the world’s #1 spot at last. This week the People’s Bank of China pumped a record CNY860bn into the money markets ($140bn), crashing Shanghai’s interbank interest rates by almost the whole one-percent point they had earlier spiked ahead of the coming New Year’s long holidays.

The disparity, meantime, between the doldrums in precious metals and the bull market in Dollar-Yen trading can be seen by glancing at the US derivatives market. Yesterday the CME Group cut margin requirements on gold and silver futures. It raised the margin payments needed to play the Yen‘s lightening drop. One of those moves is likely bullish, short-term. But you’d to borrow money to choose.

Western pension funds are meanwhile pulling out of commodities, and just as liquidity floods back into the market. Both the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times report how big institutions have quite hard assets “after finding they did little to protect their portfolios against inflation risk and the unpredictable returns of stocks.” One of the biggest commodity hedge funds, Clive Capital has shrunk from $5 billion under management two years ago to less than $2bn today. And yet European banks – the major source of credit to commodities traders – are now reviving their commodities lending.

“The sector came close to panic 18 months ago,” says the FT. But now “The banks want to be again my best friend,” says a Swiss executive. “Funding concerns have now substantially dissipated,” says SocGen’s head of natural resources and energy finance, Federico Turegano.

There’s plenty of money around to borrow, in short. Whether in Chinese banking, currency betting or commodities trading, where there was very little at all, suddenly it’s all turned up at once. Which is just how trouble arrives. All that central-bank liquidity and quantitative easing has so far left consumer-price inflation unmoved, too.

Gold 2012 – 2013 New year outlook & review

January 9, 2013 Leave a comment

A look into the past, present & future gold trend compiled by Michael J. Kosares, editor of USAGOLD
-

PAST – 2012 price point timeline
by Jonathan Kosares

Gold Trends Graph 2012

1
January 1 – Gold begins year at 1562.10
2

January 25 – President’s state of the union address – Fed extends low rate pledge to ‘at least 2014’.   Adopts 2% inflation target.  Gold rises $100 in two days, crossing $1700/oz.

3

February 20-21 – Euro-zone agrees to second Greek Bailout – 130 billion Euro.  Dow crosses 13000 for first time since pre-2008 financial crisis.  Fitch downgrades Greece to one rating above default.  Gold rises $50 and nears $1800/oz.

4

February 28 – Germany approves second bailout of Greece, pushing gold to new highs for the year ($1790.55).

5

February 29 – Gold posts biggest one-day losses ytd (down $100/oz) as Ben Bernanke fails to announce anticipated new rounds of QE during congressional testimony.

6

March 22-25 – Bernanke comments that positive trends in the labor market may not last, fueling QE speculation.  Statement curbs correction from February highs.  Gold rises $65 to just shy of $1700/oz.

7

April 2-3 – Fed Minutes released with no immediate signal for QE.  Gold drops $70 to $1612.80.  Stocks also fall.

8

May 7-May 15 – Renewed escalation of the Euro zone crises fuels a steep decline in the Euro and a rally in the dollar.  Greece fails to form Coalition.  Euro drops below 1.28 for first time since January.  Gold drops $115 in a week to retest mid $1500’s, where it began the year.

9

May 31 – Abysmal non-farm payroll report slams stocks, erasing all gains for the year.   Dollar gets crushed.  Gold rises $85 in a day to regain $1600 level as expectation for Fed intervention increases.

10

June  6-7 – Speculation of bailout of Spanish banks pressures Euro, dollar rises, gold falls.  Bernanke reiterates no imminent QE at testimony before the JEC.  Erases the majority of May 31 gains.

11

June 19-20 – FOMC Meeting – Fed extends Operation Twist, but no further mention of renewed QE.  Gold market disappointed, drops $60 in two days,  back to mid $1500’s.

12

June 28 – Gold rises $55 as Europe summit releases plan to stabilize banking system. Resembles US TARP plan.

13

July 5-9 – This time, bad job numbers actually turn gold lower, erasing gains from previous week due to Euro bank plan.  Numbers said to ‘not be bad enough to warrant immediate Fed action, but not good enough to exclude it altogether’.

14

July 24/25 – Bad economic numbers from Bank of England renew speculation of QE measures from both Bank of England and the ECB.  Gold pushes $60 higher.

15

August 19-22 -  Gold, lead by platinum and palladium, breaks from bounded range, gains $60+ in three days.  Attributed in part to expectation of ECB response to European banking crisis.  Rally given final push by accommodative Fed minutes: “Many members judged that additional monetary accommodation would likely be warranted fairly soon unless incoming information pointed to a substantial and sustainable strengthening in the pace of the economic recovery,”

16

September 6 – Gold jumps $50 on ECB announcement of ‘unlimited bond buying program’. Quoting Mario Draghi, the new “Outright Market Transactions” or OMT program, “enables the ECB to address severe distortions in government bond markets which originate from, in particular, unfounded fears on the part of investors of the reversibility of the euro.”  “The OMT will allow the central bank to buy government bonds with maturities of one to three years in unlimited quantities…”

17

September 13 – Gold gains $55 in one day as Fed announces QE3. The central bank initiates plans to expand its holdings of long-term securities with open-ended purchases of $40 billion of mortgage debt a month, while keeping interest rates low in 2015.

18

October 4 – Gold touches $1795, to reach its high for the year on continued Fed policy related buying.  Fails to break through psychologically significant $1800 level, begins short-term correction.

19
November 6 – Barack Obama is re-elected to a second term.  Gold rises $30 the day of the election.
20

November 28 – Single sale of 7800 contracts (equivalent of a 24-tonne sell order) hits gold market at the open of New York trading.  Gold slides $30, reversing month-long rally following the election.

21

December 18 – Gold falls $40, with little to no explanation.  The fiscal cliff debate moves into focus.  Selling pressure present only in the paper market, suggesting year-end bookkeeping, similar to action seen at the end of 2011.  Physical demand picks up sharply.

22

December 20 – Gold falls another $35, dropping to $1635, its lowest level since August.  Selling pressure attributed to upward revision of 3rd quarter GDP growth figures, and perceived reduction in need for continued QE.

23

December 31 – Gold finishes year at $1671.  Recovers modestly from lows of December sell-off.  Aggregate annual gain is 7.1%.

Highlights:  One might describe 2012 as a ‘noisy’ year for gold, though one that lacked any real fireworks, as the yellow metal saw a fair amount of intra-range volatility without every really breaking out in either direction.  To the point, gold failed to eclipse the highs set in September 2011 of $1920/oz., though it also shrugged off the low end of its trading range and still managed to post modest gains for the year (7.1%).  In looking back, gold saw its biggest daily moves under two scenarios:  Language modifications/policy changes by the Federal Reserve and/or resolutions/escalations of the Euro-zone crisis.   In the end, for all the speculation surrounding Fed and ECB policy, both ultimately initiated measures for unlimited liquidity, staging a strong fundamental backdrop for the yellow metal moving forward.  This same fundamental backdrop led to another year of central bank gold accumulation and strong physical demand at the investor level.  So while the gold market may continue to be hyper-sensitive to the policy language of the Fed and ECB in 2013, such ‘noise’ may only prove a distraction if gold continues to re-assert its role in the international monetary system.
-

PRESENT – $86.8 trillion in debt and living on borrowed time
by Peter Grant

Late in 2012, after the Presidential election and as the fiscal cliff debate began to really heat up, The Wall Street Journal published an article by Chris Cox and Bill Archer entitled: Why $16 Trillion Only Hints at the True U.S. Debt. The key point being: “The actual liabilities of the federal government—including Social Security, Medicare, and federal employees’ future retirement benefits—already exceed $86.8 trillion, or 550% of GDP.”

The true size of the United States’ debt burden is a harsh reality that I bring up with some regularity, but it is the 800 pound gorilla in the room that everyone in Washington seems to tiptoe around. Our $16.4 trillion national debt is plenty of cause for concern, but you heap the unfunded mandates on top of that and our level of indebtedness becomes absolutely mind-numbing. The problem of course is that much-needed and sustainable entitlement reform is the ‘third-rail’ of politics. With a rapidly aging population, politicians mess with pensions, Social Security and Medicare at their own peril.

Messrs Cox and Archer both served on President Clinton’s Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform and predicted eighteen years ago that this day was coming: “In 1994 we predicted that, unless something was done to control runaway entitlement spending, Medicare and Social Security would eventually go bankrupt or confront severe benefit cuts. Eighteen years later, nothing has been done.”

Bill Gross, co-founder and managing director of bond giant PIMCO, has repeatedly raised the alarm as well. He tweeted the following in response to the Cox and Archer piece: “WSJ Op-ed confirms PIMCO thesis: U.S. debt is 5 times what it admits to. Inflation ahead.”

If you would like to broaden your view of gold market, we invite you to sign-up for our regular newsletter and receive quality commentary like what you are now reading. It’s free of charge and comes by e-mail. You can opt out at any time.

In two words, Gross reveals what I too believe is the inevitable consequence of amassing such an incomprehensible amount of debt: “Inflation ahead.”

We are indeed in a massive hole, the true size of which is being purposefully concealed from the American people by allowing spending commitments associated with entitlements to reside ‘off balance sheet’. Meanwhile, our friends within the beltway quibble over nothing more than the speed of our continued digging.

Renowned investor Kyle Bass, founder and principal of Hayman Capital Management, provides some additional perspective in noting that since 1981, the U.S. increased its sovereign debt by 1,560% while its population increased by only 35%. That’s a pretty compelling statistic; illustrating that we have essentially borrowed the prosperity of the last three decades from the future. China, the financier of much of our debt in recent years, stated the obvious via it’s Xinhua news agency early in the new year, reminding everyone that the U.S. “simply cannot live on borrowed prosperity forever.” And yet we seem destined to try…

At the eleventh-hour Congress averted at least the tax hikes associated with the fiscal cliff, once again punting on the really important issues, which will be rehashed all over again in just a few short weeks as another hike to the debt ceiling is debated. Much like it was in 2011, a government shut-down, our sovereign debt rating and yes, the possibility of default, will hang in the balance.

“We can always print money. . .”

In all honesty, the latter is a rather remote possibility, as former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan reminded us during that 2011 debate in a now rather infamous Meet the Press interview. “The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default,” said Greenspan, as a rather uncomfortable looking Austan Goolsbee, the chairman of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors, looked on.

Greenspan’s assertion is certainly true, as evidenced by the Fed’s ongoing four-year campaign of quantitative easing (QE) — during a period of explosive deficit spending — attests. And I suspect our politicians would indeed prefer this status quo to be perpetuated, because it doesn’t really require them to do anything other than to silently bear witness to the subtle but steady confiscation of the wealth of America’s citizenry through inflation. However, overt statements about endless money printing by the likes of Greenspan undoubtedly cause great unease among the political class, drawing attention to the malfeasance being perpetrated in plain sight.

Sustaining the long-term downtrend in the dollar requires a complicit Fed to keep rates pegged near zero, by printing dollars and creating artificial demand for a seemingly never-ending supply of debt. Despite a modestly more hawkish tone in the latest FOMC minutes, our central bank has pledged to buy $85 bln in Treasuries and agency debt each and every month in 2013. That will add an additional $1.02 trillion to the Fed’s already massive balance sheet, bringing it close to $4 trillion.

Hawkish rumblings not withstanding, the Fed has committed to this path until the unemployment rate falls to 6.5%, or inflation rises above 2.5%. They risk further damaging their already tarnished credibility if they forsake the recent dramatic change in guidance.

Congress still divided in 2013

The bottom line is that the FOMC doves carried the day in December, with the lone dissenter remaining Richmond’s Jeffrey Lacker. By most estimates, including the Fed’s own central tendencies, the jobless rate is unlikely to reach 6.5% until 2015. The notion that the foot will come off the gas pedal any sooner seems unfounded, unless of course inflation ratchets higher, in which case you’ve got perhaps an even more compelling reason to own gold.

Super-accommodative monetary policy, moribund economic growth and political gridlock were the primary domestic themes affecting markets in 2012. There is little to suggest anything is going to change significantly on any of these fronts in 2013: The Fed, as we just discussed will continue down the ZIRP/QE path. The mini-deal on the fiscal cliff is actually expected to sap GDP growth to the tune of 1%-2%. The 113th Congress is every bit as divided as the 112th, and the opposing parties are poised for another contentious debate over the debt ceiling.

Beyond our borders, we saw similar themes repeated. The ECB, BoE, and BoJ are all maintaining very accommodative policy stances as well. The Swiss National Bank still has the franc pegged to the euro, with banks offering negative yields on franc deposits, in an effort to discourage safe-haven flows into the currency. Europe and Japan fell back into recession late in 2012. Concerns about the EU sovereign debt crisis remain considerable. These themes too are likely to be echoed in the new year.

Through it all, gold remained broadly consolidative within the range that was established in 2011. This range is defined by the 1920.74 all-time high set 06-Sep-11 and the 1522.48 corrective low from 29-Dec-11. Nonetheless, the yellow metal achieved a twelfth consecutive annual gain in 2012, rising a very respectable 7.1%.

The proliferation of paper

Looking ahead, one thing seems all but certain: the primary fundamental factor that has driven gold from less than $300 per ounce a dozen years ago to that all-time high of 1920.74 remains in place and is likely to remain in place for some time to come. I summarize this as the proliferation of paper: Paper in the form of debt, and paper in the form of fiat currency.

The U.S. and much of the rest of the industrialized world will continue to go deeper into debt for the foreseeable future, while attempting to offset that by ongoing currency debasement. Add to that the voracious demand for physical gold from emerging countries (most notably China) seeking to diversify out of devaluing fiat, and I think we can consider the fundamental underpinnings of the gold market to be sound.

As long as policymakers are not willing to risk their political careers with bold fiscal initiatives, the central banks will continue to deal with the resulting problems using the only tools at their disposal. While that may suit politicians just fine, let the rest of us recognize that monetary policy is a very blunt instrument.

Further currency debasement can have a devastating impact on individuals that fail to prepare for the eventuality. That is particularly true for those who are on (or will be on) fixed incomes, such as a pension and/or Social Security. There is no time like the present to begin — or to bolster — your hedge against such risks. You cling to the notion at your own peril that those in Washington, Brussels and Tokyo are looking out for your best interests and everything is going to work out just fine.
-

Future – The gold owner’s guide to 2013
by Michael J. Kosares

By the time we get to the end of 2013, we will forget much of what shaped 2012. Yet, as we look back at 2012, there are some fundamentally disheartening, if not disturbing, trends that are likely to play a determining role in all financial markets for some time to come, including the gold market.

– The first is the inability of the political sector to deal with the “economic problem” on a global basis. From Jinping’s Beijing flowing west to Putin’s Moscow, from Merkel’s Berlin to Hollande’s Paris, from Cameron’s London to Obama’s D.C. and finally Abe’s Tokyo, the world’s great nation- states are locked in a web of acute and alarming political disarray. The question is no longer whether or not stability can be achieved. It is to what degree the instability can be restrained – a circumstance not unfamiliar to the student of history, but one for which the modern investor is generally unprepared and lacking in defenses.

- The second is the global predisposition to print money. Compliments of the disastrous events following the 2008 financial meltdown, vote-buying politicians globally have defeated usually conservative central bankers in the battle of the printing press. Ben Bernanke’s stewardship of the Federal Reserve has not only been emblematic of the trend, it has served as a bad example and dangerous precedent for other central bankers. You cannot slide a sheet of paper between the monetary policies of Ben Bernanke, Mario Draghi and Mervyn King (soon to be replaced with the even more dovish Mark Carney). Shinzo Abe, who was just elected Japan’s prime minister, has threatened to nationalize the Bank of Japan if it refuses to print money. It is as if John Law were reincarnated simultaneously in every major nation-state in the world.

- The third comes to us via Raoul Pal, the highly-regarded hedge fund manager who once co-managed one of the world’s largest hedge fund groups, GLG Global Macro Fund in London. It has to do with the persistent nature of the debt crisis that began in 2007 and never really went away. Pal outlined the problem at a seminar in Shanghai this past summer for other hedge fund managers — a presentation ZeroHedge called one of the “scariest ever.” In it he predicted a cascading sovereign debt collapse and default that would begin in Europe, jump the Channel to London, then move progressively through Japan, South Korea and even China. Finally, it would envelope the United States. The problem, he says, is that $70 trillion in G-10 sovereign debt is collateral for $700 trillion in derivatives.

“You have to understand,” he explains, “that a global banking collapse and massive defaults would bring about the biggest economic shock the world has ever seen. There would be no trade finance, no shipping finance, no finance for farmers, no leasing, no bond market, no nothing. The markets are at the frankly terrifying point of realizing that LTRO (long term financing operations), EFSF (European Finance Stability Facility) and QE (quantitative easing) etc. are not going to prevent this collapse.”

(Note: A synopsis of Mr. Pal’s seminar was the most popular post for 2012, and all-time, at the widely-readZeroHedge website. Recommended.)

I do not know if Raoul Pal is correct. I don’t know if he’s even close. I can tell you that he was successful enough as a hedge fund manager to retire to Spain’s Valencia coast at 36 years of age and that he’s one of those guys like in the old commercial: When he speaks, people listen. I can also tell you that something is in the air — a sea change in investor psychology, of which we should take note. I pass this along as someone who has experienced several similar shifts in investor sentiment over the course of a forty-year career in the gold business.

In the last two months of 2012, we experienced volumes at USAGOLD not unlike those of 2008 and 2009 — and those were record volume years. The U.S. Mint confirmed our own experience by reporting that U.S. Gold Eagle sales in November and December hit their highest levels in two years. Also, demand for historic, pre-1933 gold coins surged — an important indicator because it tells us the safe-haven investor is back in the market. Since safe-haven investors tend to run ahead of the herd, this bodes well for gold demand as we move into 2013. Wholesalers tell us that the market for British sovereigns, Dutch 10 guilders, Swiss 20 francs, etc. is running very strong both in the United States and Europe. In particular, British sovereign supply has dried up. If I am reading the signs correctly (and I am big believer in letting the market speak for itself), 2013 could turn out to be a very good year for gold.

James Turk’s Outlook for Gold (2013 to 2015)

December 23, 2012 1 comment

-
With 2013 just round the corner, James Turk of GoldMoney provides an update to a longstanding forecast he made back in 2003 in Barron’s. This interview was widely talked about because whilst the gold price was USD350 at the time, James stated that he envisioned the gold price to be around USD8,000 sometime between 2013-2015.

Now 9 years later, James looks back on this forecast and explains how this original price target was determined. As this timeframe is approaching, James goes on to update this forecast considering the current economic climate.

His conclusion? Gold is going to exceed $8,000.

And here’s the referenced article ‘The Barbarous Relic – It Is Not What You Think’ and the presentation ’Everyone should have a precious metals portfolio’

Obama’s Second Coming & Streets of Gold

November 10, 2012 1 comment

-
Most shared image ever, according to Twitter

-
Gold vs everything else after Obama’s Second Coming

Gold Vs everything else after Obama's Second Comong


Streets of Gold, but not in the U.S. of A….
Search for "Renounce Citizenship"
Search volume for “Renounce Citizenship”

-

Because the Obama II administration is nowhere close to what a Paul Craig Roberts administration would look like. [Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under Reagan]

Some asked if I were elected by write-ins and not instantly assassinated, who would I appoint?

Nomi Prins would be Secretary of the Treasury, and Pam Martens would be Deputy Secretary of the Treasury.

Lew Rockwell would be the chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Michael Hudson would be chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors.

Harvey Silverglate would be Attorney General.

Glenn Greenwald would be Deputy Attorney General.

Dean Booth and Larry Stratton would be White House legal counsels.

Willie Nelson would be Secretary of Agriculture.

Jeffrey St. Clair would be head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Elizabeth Warren would have whatever post she wants.

Cynthia McKinney would be Secretary of State.

The CIA would be headed by Ray McGovern and Philip Giraldi.

The FBI would be headed by Sibel Edmonds.

Homeland Security would be abolished.

David Ray Griffin and Richard Gage would head the 9/11 investigation.

Bradley Manning would be in charge of closing down the torture prisons.

Julian Assange and John Pilger would be heads of the Public Broadcasting Corporation.

Gerald Celente would be White House Press Secretary.

John Williams (shadowstats.com) would be in charge of federal statistics.

Key members of the Bush and Obama regimes from the president down, and every neoconservative would be handed over to the war crimes tribunal for trial.

The Republicans on the Supreme Court would be impeached and removed from office.

Brooksley Born would be in charge of all federal financial regulatory agencies.

Major General Antonio Mario Taguba would be Secretary of Defense.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson would be Deputy Secretary of State.

Ron Unz would be chief of staff of the White House.

Norman Finkelstein would be US Ambassador to Israel.

Noam Chomsky would be US Ambassador to the UN.

David M. Walker would be Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

The Israel Lobby would have to register as a foreign agent.

I could go on. There are two or three hundred appointments to fill, but I think the picture is clear. It would be an administration that represented Americans, not special interests and foreigners, and an administration that put the country back in order.

But, of course, it is all a dream. No one who actually cares about our country is permitted to serve in public office.


-

Categories: News Tags: , , , , ,

Relooking At Man’s Addiction To Gold

October 24, 2012 1 comment
A friend recently wrote “something about it does not sound right” after reading an article appearing in The Star entitled “Man’s addiction to gold” by Tan Sri Lin See-Yan. She asked for my comments, and I’m sharing them here.
-
Gold Standard
-
The author’s historical account of the evolution of gold’s role in monetary systems seems to slant in the direction that gold standard-based currencies have had their opportunity since distant past; They did not work and is unlikely to work in the future.

But why this obsession with gold? Some believe tying money to gold prevents its over-issue. That’s not true. Historically, declaring a gold parity for currency has certainly not prevented governments from over-issuing currencies and experiencing price inflation. Again, others believe gold provides the discipline governments need to maintain price stability. Certainly not.

History is full of instances where mercantilist excesses led to inflation at home and deflation overseas, and vice-versa. Yet, there are those who believe gold provides a sustainable form of settlement for international payments. Not true. Growth of international commerce requires flexible access to an adequate money supply to meet its needs gold does not meet this need in any stable way.

It is interesting to note that he wrote about the going in and coming off the gold standard (GS) as if it is the same standard, without differentiating the different forms of GS adopted in the past. In fact, the world had experimented with many forms of GS, with each form operating differently from the other. Broadly speaking, they were the Classical Gold Standard, Gold Bullion Standard and the Gold Exchange Standard. Understanding how and why nations moved in and out of GS and adopting various forms of GS is essential in understanding gold’s potential role in future monetary system. Currently, for the first time in recorded history, every nation is out of any form of GS, and this experiment is just over 40 years old.
-
For balance, I can point you to two resources that slant towards the advantages of a GS.
-
What has governments done to our money? by Murray N. Rothbard of the  Ludwig  von Mises Institute. Excellent read, but if you’d like to jump straight into the history of GS adoption, it’s in the The Monetary Breakdown of the West section beginning page 85.
-
The Unadulterated Gold Standard by Keith Weiner, Gold Standard Institute (starting page 3), discussing a new form of the future GS.
-

Now to the more down to earth aspects of gold.
-
Is gold a good store of value?
-
His answer in one word – NO. And the only justification cited was Warren Buffett’s quote.

Also, many believe gold serves as a good store of value. Again, no. Because it is sterile, it is not a good store of value compared with other assets. According to billionaire W. Buffett, US$100 invested in gold in 1965 is worth US$4,455 at the end of 2011; this same amount invested in S&P 500 stocks is worth US$6,072 after the same 46 years.

This is a very weak justification on two grounds.
  1. The period of investment was chosen arbitrarily
  2. The calculation is based on a method of investment that may not be practical
1. Choosing a period to compare relative performance of two asset classes.
To show that gold is not a good store of value, he cited Buffet’s calculation that uses two dates as a basis of comparing the relative performance of stocks (represented by the S&P500 index) and gold. The start date was 1965, end date was Dec 2011. During that period, it was calculated (more on the calculations later) that stocks out-performed gold, hence gold is not a good store of value.
-
This would be a valid argument if stocks and gold’s relative performance was fairly constant throughout history, in which case, picking any start & end dates would not matter. But this is not the case, and here’s why.
-
I’ve just uploaded a Dow/Gold Ratio chart from 1900 to October 2012. The S&P/Gold Ratio chart would look similar, but I don’t have data going so far back and stretching all the way to the current date. This chart is plotted using the value (points) of the Dow Jones Industrial Index for each trading day since 1990 divided by the price of gold in US$ for that day. The ratio represents the number of ounces of gold required to buy one unit of the Dow.
-
Reproduced below with annotations, you’ll notice that stocks (represented by the Dow) and gold went through three distinct cycles (A, B & C) of over-performance and under-performance relative to one another. During each cycle, a rising ratio indicates that it takes more ounces of gold to buy one unit of the stock index; meaning stocks are outperforming gold, and vice-versa.
-
Dow Gold Ratio: 1900 to 2012
-
It is evident from this DGR chart that that picking a start and end date within the green segments of the three cycles would always show that gold is a “barbaric relic” while picking a period within the yellow segments would make gold shine. This chart clearly shows that both stocks and gold played their role as a good store of value at different times.
-
To substantiate his point that gold is not a good store of value, he relied on Buffet’s arbitrary starting point of 1965, ending 2011. Nothing wrong with this period, but why 46 years and not 2,000 years or 12 years? Because if it’s either one, his answer to the good store of value question would have to be a resounding YES. To run down gold as a sterile barbaric relic which is not a good store of value based only on an arbitrarily chosen period is misleading at best or simply mischievous.
-
If Buffet or Tan Sri could pick an arbitrary period to make their point that gold is not a good store a value, let us do the same. If we pick the start date as Jan 2000, end date 2012, we get the two great looking 12-year charts below. The first  is the percentage change in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathway stock price vs gold – that’s 12 straight years of under performance. To be fair, this chart excludes dividend yields, but it cannot possibly make up the huge gap. But I’m not going to conclude that Buffet’s Berkshire Hathway’s stock is not a good store of value. It’s just not as good as gold during this period.
-
The second chart below compares gold & silver with the general stock market. Again, I would not put out a sweeping statement that stocks are not a good store of value. If I had chosen the starting date to be Jan 1980, it will look very different. I just wished the “stock bugs” would handle data with similar respect.
-
Inline images 2-
Gold & silver versus Dow from Jan 2000 to Oct 2012
(Red=Gold, Blue=Silver, Green=Dow)
Gold, SIlver Vs Dow 2000 to 2012
-
My point here is not to run down stocks, but just to rebut “stock bugs” who run down gold bugs irresponsibly. Clearly both asset classes have their place in history as stores of value. Question is , under the current economic, monetary and geo-political climate, which asset class will do a better job at wealth preservation going forward.
-
Dow Gold Ratio (DGR): Currently at 7.7. A long way to go towards historical lows of 1.0
-
Lets look closer at the DGR chart. Notice that with each successive cycle, the peaks get higher and when they correct, the troughs also get lower. This phenomenon is known as an overshoot; It happens in nature and is applicable in financial models as well.
-
Many analysts predict the ratio will approach, or even plunge below 1.0. For the ratio to reach 1:1 at current prices, the Dow would have to move down from 13,346 to match gold at 1,726 or gold moves up from $1,726 to meet the Dow at $13,346. With the QE to Infinity policy currently in place, more likely than not, both would move up, with gold rising at a faster rate; Or they may meet anywhere in between to establish a 1:1 ratio.
-
A casual glance at the Dow/Gold Ratio chart above may give the impression that at this point (DGR=7.7), new entrants to gold may have missed the boat considering that it has already moved so far down from its peak. However, in percentage terms, that’s only about 600% from the peak, while the rest of the journey, if we reach 1.0, would be close to another 700% from current levels.
-
2. The calculation is based on a method of investment that may not be practical
-
Now, assuming the picking of an arbitrary period is a non issue, an average investor is unlikely to achieve the kind of returns cited. Going back to the billionaire’s calculation:

US$100 invested in gold in 1965 is worth US$4,455 at the end of 2011; this same amount invested in S&P 500 stocks is worth US$6,072 after the same 46 years

Let’s use his figures and convert them to percentage gains.
Percentage gain on $100 invested in stocks = ((6071-100)/100)x100% = 6,071%
Percentage gain on $100 invested in gold = ((4455-100)/100)x100% = 4,355%
-
Now, if you calculate the percentage gain of the S&P from Jan 1965 (85.37) to Dec 2011 (1,265), you’ll come up with a gain of 1,382% , nothing close to the 5,972% gains cited above. That’s because you’ve just calculated the capital gains of the S&P index over that period. In other words, the increase in the value of your investment based on the increase of your stock price.
-
Outflow of funds from stocksTo achieve a gain of 6,071% you’ll have to factor in dividend yields, assuming that every dollar distributed is reinvested immediately. This is referred to as the Total Returns calculation. In practice, it’s not so straight forward to achieve. That’s because there are issues like timing, tax, brokers’ fees, etc to consider. See Limitations of Total Return as a Measure for Fund, Bond and Stock Performance. I doubt an average investor would be able to achieve the total returns cited in his calculations.
-
Gold, on the other hand is straight forward. Gold’s gain from Jan 1965 ($35.50) to Dec 2011 ($1,603), was a clean 4,415% (close to his calculated 4,355%) capital gain. This is despite the fact that in Dec 2011, gold was at its lowest during the current correction. Hence, if the dividends were not reinvested in full and immediately, gold would have outperformed stocks based on capital gains alone.
-
Gold Bug & Gold Investment Schemes
-
The recent raid by Bank Negara on Genneva Malaysia Sdn Bhd and three other companies have cast a bad light on things related to gold. The public tend to associate gold ownership with buying into one of these scams. When news of the raids broke out, I have well meaning friends asking me if I was affected! Thanks, but I would not touch these with a 10-foot pole. I totally agree with the author’s advise on this point:

My advice: avoid investing in any of them at all cost!

There are however, many genuine options to own gold safely and cost-effectively for Malaysians (unlike the 30% premium charged by Genneva) . Check out Buying & Storage Options for more details.
-
The other thing I’m on the author’s side is that I don’t consider myself a gold bug. I am using gold (& silver) as a store of value until such time when it’s prudent to exit gold (& silver). Check out when you may have to start converting your gold into another asset class which may be a better store of value in the future. When to exit gold?
-
Related Resources:
-
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 247 other followers

%d bloggers like this: